Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2017-08-02 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e is a lot better than the LG Q6, with an 86.3 score against 71.8. The Galaxy S10e design is newer and a little thinner than the LG Q6's, but it is also just a little heavier. Galaxy S10e features a superior CPU than LG Q6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10e also has 3 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e features just a bit better looking screen than LG Q6, because although it has a quite worse screen density, it also counts with a quite bigger display and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels. The Galaxy S10e has a bigger storage to install games and applications than LG Q6, because although it has a SD extension slot that holds 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Galaxy S10e shoots better photographs and videos than LG Q6, because although it has a lesser MP resolution camera, it also counts with a lot larger diafragm aperture to take better images and video in low-light environments and a much better (4K) video definition. The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than LG Q6, because it has a 3100mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
The Galaxy S10e costs a lot more money than the LG Q6, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.