Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-02 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 is much better than the LG Q6, getting a score of 94.8 against 71.8. The Samsung Galaxy S20 body is way newer and a bit thinner than the LG Q6's, although it is a bit heavier. Samsung Galaxy S20 features just a bit better looking display than LG Q6, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px, a greater amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a little bigger display.
Galaxy S20 features a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than LG Q6, because although it has an external memory slot that holds 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a better processor than LG Q6, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with longer battery duration than LG Q6, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh. Samsung Galaxy S20 captures greater pictures and videos than LG Q6, because although it has a lesser MP resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger camera aperture and a way better video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 costs a lot more than LG Q6, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.