Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-02 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE is way better than LG Q6, having a general score of 90.8 against 71.8. The Galaxy S20 FE is a extremely newer cellphone than the LG Q6, although it's extremely heavier and a little bit thicker. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a quite better performance than LG Q6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S20 FE features a slightly better display than LG Q6, because although it has a quite worse screen density, it also counts with a larger display and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Galaxy S20 FE shoots much better videos and photos than LG Q6, because although it has a lower 12 MP resolution camera, it also counts with a larger aperture and a lot better video resolution.
The Galaxy S20 FE has a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than LG Q6, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a way better battery duration than LG Q6, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S20 FE costs a lot more than LG Q6, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.