Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-02 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a global score of 98, which is much better than the LG Q6's 71.8 general score. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G construction is way newer than the LG Q6's, but it is a lot heavier and just a little thicker. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a greater performance than LG Q6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little more vivid screen than LG Q6, because it has a larger screen, a little bit greater pixel count in each inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features much more memory for games and applications than LG Q6, because although it has a SD card slot that admits up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a very superior battery life than LG Q6, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots way better photographs and videos than LG Q6, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a bigger aperture to take better images in low-light situations and a camera with much more mega-pixels.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG Q6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG Q6. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, else you can save some dollars and get the LG Q6, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.