Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2017-08-02 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a global score of 95.4, which is a lot better than the LG Q6's overall score of 71.8. Even though Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is notably newer than the LG Q6, it is a little bit thicker and much heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has just a bit better performance than LG Q6, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant screen than LG Q6, because it has a bigger display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a just a bit greater pixel count in each inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra captures much clearer pictures and videos than LG Q6, because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a larger diafragm aperture and a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
LG Q6 counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much better battery duration than LG Q6, because it has a 67% larger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG Q6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG Q6. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy S22 Ultra, but if you don't you can save some money and get the LG Q6, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.