Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-08-02 | -- |
| 5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 5.26 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.64 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 is much better than LG Q6, having an 82.6 score against 71.8. The Galaxy S25 is a lighter and way thinner cellphone than the LG Q6. Samsung Galaxy S25 has a sharper display than LG Q6, because although it has a little lower display pixel density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit bigger screen.
LG Q6 has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S25, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG Q6 has a lot better hardware performance than Galaxy S25, although it has 5 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The Galaxy S25 captures greater photographs and videos than LG Q6, because it has a back camera with lot more megapixels, a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light environments. Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with greater battery duration than LG Q6, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG Q6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG Q6. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy S25, but if you don't you can save some money and get the LG Q6, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.