Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2017-08-02 | 2016-03-11 |
| 5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 is better than the LG Q6, with a 79.5 score against 71.8. The Samsung Galaxy S7 design is just a little bit thinner than LG Q6, but it is just a little heavier and was released around 17 months before. The Galaxy S7 features a bit superior CPU than LG Q6, because although it has 4 less cores , it also counts with a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S7 counts with a much better looking display than LG Q6, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy S7 captures much better photos and videos than LG Q6, because although it has a lesser megapixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a much bigger aperture.
LG Q6 features a way bigger storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG Q6 also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a battery life that's just as good as the battery life in LG Q6.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.