Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-02 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro has a general score of 81, which is much better than LG Q6's 71.8 overall score. The Galaxy XCover Pro construction is much newer, but thicker and incredibly heavier than LG Q6. The Galaxy XCover Pro has just a little better processing power than LG Q6, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
The LG Q6 and the Galaxy XCover Pro feature really similar screens, because although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a just a bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little larger display. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro captures better pictures and videos than LG Q6, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a much bigger aperture to capture better images and video in low-light situations and a way better 25 megapixels resolution back camera.
The LG Q6 features a slightly bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a superior battery performance than LG Q6, because it has a 4050mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro costs a lot more money than LG Q6, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.