Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-02 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 205.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is way better than the LG Q6's global score of 71.8. The Galaxy Z Flip is a notably newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than the LG Q6, but it is heavier. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a greater hardware performance than LG Q6, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little sharper display than LG Q6, because although it has a little lower screen density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little bit better storage capacity for apps and games than LG Q6, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a better camera than LG Q6, because although it has a camera in the back with a lower resolution, it also counts with a lot better video quality and a bigger aperture to capture better images in poorly lited environments. Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a little better battery life than LG Q6, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG Q6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG Q6. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG Q6, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.