Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-02 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 205.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is much better than LG Q6's global score of 71.8. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G body is noticeably newer and thinner, but also heavier than LG Q6. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little sharper screen than LG Q6, because although it has a bit worse display density, it also counts with a larger screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2636.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a quite superior processing power than LG Q6, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a slightly bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than LG Q6, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much better camera than LG Q6, because although it has a camera in the back with a worse 12 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a bigger diafragm aperture. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little longer battery life than LG Q6, because it has a 10 percent more battery size.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a lot more money than LG Q6, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.