Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-02 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 205.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a global score of 94.6, which is way better than LG Q6's 71.8 general score. Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is way newer and thinner, but also noticeably heavier than the LG Q6. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a screen that is just as good as the LG Q6 one, because although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a quite inferior number of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1768 x 2208 and a really larger display.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a better processor than LG Q6, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little bit more memory capacity for games and applications than LG Q6, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a really longer battery performance than LG Q6, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. Galaxy Z Fold 2 takes much better photos and videos than LG Q6, because although it has a back-facing camera with less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a much better (4K) video definition and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photos and video.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG Q6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG Q6. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, otherwise you can save some money and buy the LG Q6, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.