Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Sony |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-08-02 | 2018-04-05 |
| 5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has a general score of 79, which is much better than the LG Q6's global score of 71.8. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact body is heavier and notably thicker than LG Q6. Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a better performing processing unit than LG Q6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Xperia XZ2 Compact has a more vivid screen than LG Q6, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2160 resolution, the Xperia XZ2 Compact also counts with a just a little better display pixels density. The LG Q6 features more storage capacity to install games and applications than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Xperia XZ2 Compact captures much better photographs and videos than LG Q6, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photography in poorly lited situations, a much better 3840x2160 video quality and a camera with a lot better resolution. The LG Q6 features a little longer battery life than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity instead of 2870mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.