Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-20 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gray and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.64 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel has a general score of 80.2, which is a bit better than LG Q60's 73.9 general score. The Google Pixel body has the same thickness than LG Q60, but it's lighter. Google Pixel features a little bit better performance than LG Q60, because although it has 4 less CPU cores , it also counts with 1 GB more RAM memory.
Google Pixel counts with a bit better screen than LG Q60, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a lot higher pixels density. The Google Pixel features a bit better camera than LG Q60, because although it has a camera in the back with way less megapixels resolution, and they both have a same size aperture, the Google Pixel also counts with a way higher (4K) video quality and a lot bigger sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality.
LG Q60 counts with a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Q60 has superior battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 2770mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.