Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-20 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is much better than the LG Q60, having an 82.5 score against 73.9. Google Pixel 2 XL's body is a little thinner than LG Q60, although it is just a little heavier and was released around 19 months before. The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a bit more powerful CPU than LG Q60, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 2 XL also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 2 XL features a more vivid screen than LG Q60, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with much more pixels per inch of display and a much better resolution of 1440 x 2880. LG Q60 counts with much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than LG Q60, because it has 3520mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh. The Google Pixel 2 XL takes a bit better photographs and videos than LG Q60, because although it has a much worse resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor, a lot higher (4K) video definition and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.