Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-20 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has an overall score of 80, which is just a bit better than the LG Q60's score of 73.9. The Google Pixel 3 design is just a little bit thinner and lighter than LG Q60, even though both were released with only 7 months difference. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit superior processing unit than LG Q60, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 3 also has 1 GB more RAM.
The Google Pixel 3 has a bit better display than LG Q60, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot greater screen pixel density and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2160px. The Google Pixel 3 shoots a bit better videos and photos than LG Q60, because although it has a camera in the back with a way worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor shooting better quality photos and videos, a way higher video resolution and a larger camera aperture.
The LG Q60 has much more storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG Q60 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Q60 features better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 20% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.