Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-20 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a has an overall score of 78.8, which is a little bit better than LG Q60's overall score of 73.9. Although Google Pixel 3a and LG Q60 were released only 0 months apart, Google Pixel 3a is somewhat lighter and a bit thinner. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 3a has an older 11 version and LG Q60 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Google Pixel 3a has just a little better processing power than LG Q60, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 3a also has 1 GB more RAM. The Google Pixel 3a counts with just a bit better screen than LG Q60, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much better 1080 x 2220px resolution and a lot greater pixel quantity per inch in the display.
LG Q60 counts with a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG Q60 also has a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 3a takes clearer pictures and videos than LG Q60, because although it has a back facing camera with a much lower 12.2 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor taking higher quality photographs and videos, a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a larger aperture for better low light captures and video.
The LG Q60 counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 3500mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.