Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-20 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL is slightly better than LG Q60, getting a score of 78.9 against 73.9. These phones have Android OS, but Google Pixel 3a XL has an older 11 version and LG Q60 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Google Pixel 3a XL construction is a little lighter and just a little bit thinner than LG Q60, even though both were released only 0 months apart.
Google Pixel 3a XL has a little bit better performance than LG Q60, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 3a XL also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Google Pixel 3a XL has just a bit better looking display than LG Q60, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much better pixels count per screen inch and a way better 1080 x 2160 resolution.
The LG Q60 features a much greater memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the LG Q60 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 3a XL captures just a bit better videos and photos than LG Q60, because although it has a back facing camera with a lot lower resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better images and videos in poorly lited situations, a much better (4K) video resolution and a larger back camera sensor which provides a higher image and video quality.
Google Pixel 3a XL has a bit longer battery life than LG Q60, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.