Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-20 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a global score of 81.9, which is much better than LG Q60's 73.9 overall score. The Google Pixel 4 construction is a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than the LG Q60, even though both were only released 5 months apart. Google Pixel 4 counts with a superior hardware performance than LG Q60, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 4 counts with a much better screen than LG Q60, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way better number of pixels per display inch and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2280px. The LG Q60 counts with a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the LG Q60 also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Google Pixel 4 takes a little bit better pictures and videos than LG Q60, because although it has a way worse 12.2 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video quality, a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light images and videos.
The LG Q60 features superior battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 25% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.