Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-20 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ is better than LG Q60, having a general score of 82.7 against 73.9. LG G8X ThinQ's body is a little thinner but somewhat heavier than the LG Q60, and both were released only a couple months apart. These phones come with Android OS, but the LG G8X ThinQ has the older 10 version while LG Q60 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a bit sharper screen than LG Q60, because it has a little bigger screen, a much higher display density and a lot higher 1080 x 2340px resolution. The LG G8X ThinQ features more memory for applications and games than LG Q60, and although they both have a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB, the LG G8X ThinQ also has 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
LG G8X ThinQ features a better processing unit than LG Q60, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM. The LG G8X ThinQ has just a bit better battery duration than LG Q60, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. LG G8X ThinQ captures just a bit better pictures and videos than LG Q60, because although it has a much less megapixels camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better low-light photography, a lot better video quality and a larger back camera sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.