Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-05-20 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is much better than LG Q60, getting an 82.5 score against 73.9. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but the LG V30S ThinQ has the previous 8.0 Oreo version while LG Q60 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Despite of the fact that LG V30S ThinQ is older than LG Q60, it's construction is thinner and a bit lighter.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a much better looking screen than LG Q60, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a lot greater display pixels density. The LG V30S ThinQ features more memory for apps and games than LG Q60, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 128 GB internal memory.
LG V30S ThinQ has just a little better hardware performance than LG Q60, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has more RAM. The LG Q60 counts with just a little better battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh. The LG V30S ThinQ features a slightly better camera than LG Q60, and although they both have the same resolution camera, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a bigger aperture, a lot better (4K) video definition and a bigger sensor shooting higher quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.