Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-20 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is a lot better than the LG Q60, with a 91.2 score against 73.9. The LG Wing body is newer, but way thicker and much heavier than LG Q60. Both phones in this comparison review use Android operating system, but LG Wing has the older 10 version while LG Q60 has Android 9.0 Pie. LG Wing features a bit better processing power than LG Q60, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Wing also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
LG Wing has a little more vivid screen than LG Q60, because it has a bit larger screen, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels and a greater pixel number per screen inch. LG Wing shoots way better videos and photos than LG Q60, because it has a back camera with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution, a much bigger camera sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality, a larger camera aperture for better low-light images and video and a much better video resolution.
LG Wing has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than LG Q60, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB, the LG Wing also has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The LG Wing has just a bit better battery life than LG Q60, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.