Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Microsoft |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-20 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is better than LG Q60, with a score of 85.3 against 73.9. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a extremely newer and notably thinner cellphone than LG Q60, but it is also incredibly heavier. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS, but Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has the previous 11 version and LG Q60 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a quite superior processing power than LG Q60, and although they both have 8 cores, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 also has more RAM memory. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a more vivid display than LG Q60, because it has a way better 1892 x 2688 pixels resolution, a better pixels number per inch in the display, a lot brighter display and a lot larger screen.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 captures a bit better videos and photos than LG Q60, because although it has a lot worse resolution camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better captures and video in low-light situations and a much better 3840x2160 video resolution. The LG Q60 counts with much more memory capacity for games and applications than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with greater battery duration than LG Q60, because it has a 27% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.