Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-05-20 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Interstellar Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 8.64 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is much better than LG Q60, having a global score of 83.4 against 73.9. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a somewhat heavier device than the LG Q60, but both are equally thin. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has the previous 13 version while LG Q60 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a better display than LG Q60, because it has much more brightness, a little bit bigger display, more pixels per inch of screen and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The LG Q60 has a much faster processor than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro takes way better pictures and videos than LG Q60, because it has a much higher video quality, a much larger back-facing camera sensor, a bigger aperture to take better low-light photography and video and a lot better 50 megapixels resolution camera in the back. LG Q60 counts with a quite bigger storage for applications and games than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features superior battery lifetime than LG Q60, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.