Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-05-20 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto Z Force is slightly better than LG Q60, with a global score of 75.8 against 73.9. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Moto Z Force has an older 7.0 Nougat version and LG Q60 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Moto Z Force design is a bit lighter and thinner than LG Q60, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before.
Moto Z Force features a little better performance than LG Q60, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with more RAM. Moto Z Force counts with a better display than LG Q60, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher pixels number per inch in the screen and a lot better 1440 x 2560px resolution.
Moto Z Force's memory for games and applications is just as good as LG Q60's one, they have the same internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Moto Z Force shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than LG Q60, because it has a much higher resolution back-facing camera, a much higher 3840x2160 video quality and a bigger aperture to take better photos in low-light situations.
The Moto Z Force and LG Q60 count with extremely similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.