Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-20 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper is slightly better than the LG Q60, having a 79.8 score against 73.9. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android operating system, but Motorola One Hyper has older 11 version and LG Q60 has Android 9.0 Pie. Even being the best cellphone in our current comparison, the Motorola One Hyper body is heavier and just a little thicker than the LG Q60.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a bit more vivid screen than LG Q60, because it has a little bit larger display, more pixels per inch in the display and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px. Motorola One Hyper features a little better processing power than LG Q60, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola One Hyper also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Motorola One Hyper features slightly more memory capacity to install applications and games than LG Q60, because although it has a SD extension slot that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory. The Motorola One Hyper captures greater photographs and videos than LG Q60, because it has a way higher video quality, a back camera with a much better resolution and a larger aperture.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a little better battery life than LG Q60, because it has a 14% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.