Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-20 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is much better than LG Q60, getting a score of 87 against 73.9. These phones have Android operating system, but Motorola razr (2020) has older 11 version and LG Q60 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Motorola razr (2020) body is newer and a little bit thinner than LG Q60's, although it is also heavier.
The Motorola razr (2020) has just a bit better looking display than LG Q60, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels density and a higher resolution of 876 x 2142 pixels. The LG Q60 counts with a greater memory to install applications and games than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit better processor than LG Q60, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Motorola razr (2020) features a way better camera than LG Q60, because it has a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a back facing camera with a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution, a larger camera aperture to take better captures and video in low-light situations and a lot bigger camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos.
LG Q60 features better battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 25 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.