Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-20 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cyber shade |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a score of 75.8, which is slightly better than LG Q60's 73.9 general score. Despite being the best phone we compare here, the nubia Red Magic 3S construction is thicker and somewhat heavier than LG Q60. Both phones we are comparing here come with the same Android 9.0 Pie operating system, so you shouldn't see any differences regarding that.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a better performance than LG Q60, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a little more vivid display than LG Q60, because it has a better display pixels density, a bit larger screen and a lot higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The LG Q60 has a greater storage to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much better battery duration than LG Q60, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a very superior camera than LG Q60, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video definition, a lot bigger camera sensor shooting lot better quality photos, a larger aperture for better images and videos in low-light situations and a back camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.