Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-20 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A31 is just a bit better than LG Q60, with a global score of 81.3 against 73.9. Both devices in this comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A31 has the older 10 version while LG Q60 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy A31 is a just a little bit heavier cellphone than the LG Q60, but both are equally thin.
The Galaxy A31 features just a bit better processing power than LG Q60, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A31 also has 1 GB more RAM. The Galaxy A31 features a little bit better display than LG Q60, because it has a little larger display, much more pixels per inch of display and a lot higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The LG Q60 counts with a much bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG Q60 also has an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A31 features a better camera than LG Q60, and although they both have a F2 aperture, the same (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A31 also has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a much higher 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than LG Q60, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.