Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-05-20 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is a lot better than LG Q60's 73.9 overall score. The Galaxy A52 5G construction is newer and just a little thinner than the LG Q60's, although it's also just a bit heavier. Both phones we are comparing here have Android OS, but Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version while LG Q60 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy A52 5G has a little faster processor than LG Q60, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy A52 5G features just a bit better looking screen than LG Q60, because it has a lot greater display pixel density, a quite bigger screen and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little bit more storage for games and applications than LG Q60, because although it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has improved battery performance than LG Q60, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much better camera than LG Q60, because it has a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution back facing camera, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking lot better quality photos, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.