Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-20 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 8.64 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A6 is a bit better than LG Q60, getting a overall score of 75.8 against 73.9. Galaxy A6 is an older cellphone than the LG Q60, but it is somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter anyway. Samsung Galaxy A6 has a little bit better performance than LG Q60. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM amount.
LG Q60 has a slightly better screen than Galaxy A6, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a quite better resolution of 720 x 1520px. LG Q60 features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A6 counts with just a bit better camera than LG Q60, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same resolution camera, the Samsung Galaxy A6 also has a bigger back camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs and a larger aperture.
The LG Q60 counts with just a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a 3500mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.