Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-20 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 is better than the LG Q60, getting a overall score of 87.5 against 73.9. Even though Galaxy A71 and LG Q60 were released only 9 months apart, the Galaxy A71 construction is just a bit heavier but thinner. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but the Galaxy A71 has the older 11 version while LG Q60 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy A71 counts with a bit better hardware performance than LG Q60, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A71 also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy A71 has a little bit better display than LG Q60, because it has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a bit larger screen and a better pixels count in each display inch.
Galaxy A71 takes a lot better pictures and videos than LG Q60, because it has a lot higher resolution camera in the back, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a bigger aperture and a way larger sensor shooting much better quality videos and photos. LG Q60 has a bit bigger memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 has superior battery duration than LG Q60, because it has a 29% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.