Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-20 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism bricks black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is way better than LG Q60, having a global score of 92.9 against 73.9. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a newer and a bit thinner cellphone than LG Q60, although it is a little heavier. These phones use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has older 10 version and LG Q60 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit more vivid screen than LG Q60, because it has a lot higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a quite bigger screen and a better screen pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit bigger memory for applications and games than LG Q60, because although it has an external memory card slot that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit more powerful processing unit than LG Q60, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has 5 GB more RAM. Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots way better videos and photos than LG Q60, because it has a lot better video resolution, a bigger camera aperture, a lot larger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a much more mega pixels back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has better battery lifetime than LG Q60, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.