Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-20 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is a lot better than the LG Q60, with a 97.6 score against 73.9. Galaxy Fold's construction is notably heavier but way thinner than LG Q60, and both of them were released with only a couple months difference. Both phones in this comparison review include the same Android 9.0 Pie OS, so they should count with the same operating system features.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a better CPU than LG Q60, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory. Galaxy Fold counts with a bit more vivid screen than LG Q60, because it has a larger screen, more pixels per inch of display and a much higher resolution of 1536 x 2152px.
Samsung Galaxy Fold takes much better pictures and videos than LG Q60, because although it has a way less megapixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a much larger diafragm aperture, a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and pictures and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG Q60, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Galaxy Fold features longer battery performance than LG Q60, because it has a 4380mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.