Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-05-20 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 8.64 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M20 has an overall score of 78.9, which is slightly better than LG Q60's 73.9 global score. The Galaxy M20 is an a little bit heavier and just a little thicker phone than LG Q60. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy M20 has 10 version while LG Q60 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy M20 has a bit superior CPU than LG Q60, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy M20 also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy M20 has a bit better screen than LG Q60, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Galaxy M20 also has a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution and way more pixels per inch in the screen.
LG Q60 has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M20, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG Q60 also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy M20 features a superior battery performance than LG Q60, because it has a 43% more battery size.
The LG Q60 features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, a same size sensor and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the LG Q60 also counts with a more mega pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.