Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-20 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 267 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M51 has an overall score of 87.7, which is much better than the LG Q60's overall score of 73.9. Samsung Galaxy M51's construction is newer, but just a little thicker and heavier than LG Q60. Both devices we compare here have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy M51 has 10 version and LG Q60 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy M51 counts with a bit better processing power than LG Q60, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy M51 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy M51 has a slightly better display than LG Q60, because it has a much better resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a bit larger screen and a higher display density.
Galaxy M51 shoots a lot better pictures and videos than LG Q60, because it has a much bigger sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photographs, a much better (4K) video resolution, a bigger aperture and a camera with lot more megapixels. LG Q60 features a little bit more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy M51 features a really longer battery life than LG Q60, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.