Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-20 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than LG Q60, with a general score of 98.9 against 73.9. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's construction is newer and just a bit thinner than LG Q60's, but it's somewhat heavier. Both devices we compare here use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the previous 13 version and LG Q60 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a more vivid screen than LG Q60, because it has a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3088, a little bit larger screen and a way higher screen pixels density. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a slightly better memory capacity for apps and games than LG Q60, because although it has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a better performing processor than LG Q60, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots much better pictures and videos than LG Q60, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photos and videos, a back facing camera with a much higher resolution and a much bigger sensor capturing lot better quality photos and videos.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with better battery performance than LG Q60, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.