Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-05-20 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note3 is slightly better than LG Q60, with a 77.7 score against 73.9. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Note3 has older 4.4.2 version and LG Q60 has Android 9.0 Pie. Samsung Galaxy Note3 is an way older device than the LG Q60, but it is a little bit lighter and just a little thinner anyway.
Galaxy Note3 counts with a bit better screen than LG Q60, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1080 x 1920px resolution and a greater screen pixel density. The Galaxy Note3 features a bit superior CPU than LG Q60, although it has lesser cpu cores (although faster), they both have 3 GB of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note3 captures clearer videos and photos than LG Q60, because although it has a camera with a lower 13 mega pixels resolution and a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking photos and videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a larger sensor shooting higher quality videos and photos.
The LG Q60 has a much better memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG Q60 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG Q60 features just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.