Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-20 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.64 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 is just a bit better than the LG Q60, getting a 79.5 score against 73.9. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note7 is older than LG Q60, it's design is just a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner. Galaxy Note7 has a bit better CPU than LG Q60, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Note7 has a much better looking display than LG Q60, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way better display pixel density and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Galaxy Note7 features a slightly better camera than LG Q60, because although it has a much less megapixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better images in low light environments and a bigger sensor taking higher quality videos and photographs.
The LG Q60 features a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG Q60 also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Q60 and Samsung Galaxy Note7 have very similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.