Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-20 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has an overall score of 89.7, which is way better than the LG Q60's score of 73.9. Although the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite and LG Q60 were released only 9 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite body is just a bit thinner but also a bit heavier than LG Q60. Galaxy S10 Lite counts with just a bit better display than LG Q60, because it has a greater count of pixels per inch of screen, a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bit larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a little bit better memory capacity to install games and applications than LG Q60, because although it has an external memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a quite better performance than LG Q60, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has 5 GB more RAM.
Galaxy S10 Lite has a way better camera than LG Q60, and although they both have a F2 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a back camera with way more mega pixels, a much bigger back camera sensor shooting much higher quality photos and videos and a way better (4K) video resolution. Galaxy S10 Lite counts with superior battery performance than LG Q60, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.