Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-20 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e has a global score of 86.3, which is much better than the LG Q60's overall score of 73.9. Samsung Galaxy S10e's body is just a little bit thinner and lighter than LG Q60, even when both were released only a couple of months apart. Galaxy S10e counts with a quite superior performance than LG Q60, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10e also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S10e counts with a slightly better looking display than LG Q60, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much higher screen pixel density and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels. The LG Q60 counts with slightly more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG Q60 counts with just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity. Galaxy S10e shoots much clearer pictures and videos than LG Q60, because although it has a way worse resolution back camera, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video definition, a larger back-facing camera sensor and a lot larger diafragm aperture for better captures and video in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.