Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-20 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 is way better than LG Q60, having a general score of 94.8 against 73.9. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S20 has an older 13 version and LG Q60 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Samsung Galaxy S20 design is newer, just a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than LG Q60.
The Galaxy S20 has a sharper screen than LG Q60, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much better pixels quantity per inch in the display and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px. Galaxy S20 counts with a slightly bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG Q60, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a superior performance than LG Q60, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has 9 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a bit longer battery life than LG Q60, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy S20 shoots better pictures and videos than LG Q60, because although it has a camera with a much worse resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better captures and video in low light situations, a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a way larger camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.