Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-20 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than the LG Q60, getting a score of 98 against 73.9. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the older 13 version and LG Q60 has Android 9.0 Pie. Even though Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is newer than LG Q60, it's extremely heavier and a little bit thicker.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a better performance than LG Q60, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 9 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a brighter display than LG Q60, because it has a bit bigger screen, a lot higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution and a much greater pixel number per inch of display.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a slightly better storage capacity for games and applications than LG Q60, because although it has an external SD slot that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a way better camera than LG Q60, because it has a larger camera aperture, a way better video resolution, a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution and a lot bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much longer battery performance than LG Q60, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.