Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-05-20 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the LG Q60, getting a general score of 95.4 against 73.9. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra body is much newer, but just a bit thicker and way heavier than LG Q60. Both of these devices use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has older 13 version while LG Q60 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a way better looking screen than LG Q60, because it has a quite larger screen, a way greater pixel count per inch in the screen, a way better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a much brighter display. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a little bit better processing power than LG Q60, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
LG Q60 features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a superior battery duration than LG Q60, because it has a 43 percent more battery size.
Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots way better photos and videos than LG Q60, because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a camera with way more MP, a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality photos and a larger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.