Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-20 | -- |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 6.07 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.64 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 has a score of 82.6, which is much better than LG Q60's 73.9 general score. The Galaxy S25 construction is incredibly lighter and notably thinner than LG Q60. Both devices in this comparison include Android OS, but Galaxy S25 has the older 14 version and LG Q60 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The LG Q60 counts with a very superior processing power than Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy S25 features a way better display than LG Q60, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px, way more screen brightness and way more pixels per inch of screen.
LG Q60 counts with a way bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S25, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S25 takes much clearer photos and videos than LG Q60, because it has a larger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light environments, a way better video quality, a lot better resolution camera and a much larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy S25 features a little better battery duration than LG Q60, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.