Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-05-20 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 267 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is just a bit better than LG Q60, having an 80.1 score against 73.9. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has 8.0 Oreo version while LG Q60 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a newer phone than the LG Q60, although it's a lot thicker and heavier.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little bit better hardware performance than LG Q60, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a better display than LG Q60, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much better display density and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The LG Q60 has a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG Q60 also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with better battery life than LG Q60, because it has a 29 percent greater battery size.
LG Q60 counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and a tinier camera sensor taking less light and washed colors, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the LG Q60 also counts with a camera in the back with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.