Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-20 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has an overall score of 81, which is a little bit better than LG Q60's general score of 73.9. Despite being the best cellphone in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro body is a lot heavier and somewhat thicker than LG Q60. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has the older 11 version and LG Q60 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a little better processing power than LG Q60, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a little sharper screen than LG Q60, and although they both have a same size screen, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a lot better display density.
The LG Q60 counts with a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG Q60 also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro takes a bit better photographs and videos than LG Q60, because although it has a lot tinier back camera sensor which gives a way worse image and video quality, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture and a camera in the back with a lot better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with improved battery lifetime than LG Q60, because it has a 16 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.