Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-20 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is much better than the LG Q60's general score of 73.9. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip has the previous 12 version and LG Q60 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy Z Flip construction is newer and thinner than LG Q60's, but it is also just a bit heavier.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a slightly better display than LG Q60, because it has a little bigger display, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 and a lot greater count of pixels per inch in the screen. The LG Q60 features more memory for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a better processor than LG Q60, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip takes much clearer photos and videos than LG Q60, because although it has a camera in the back with a much lower resolution, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video quality, a larger back camera sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality and a larger diafragm aperture for better photography in low-light environments.
LG Q60 features a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 3500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.