Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-20 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is way better than the LG Q60's score of 73.9. Both phones in this comparison work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the previous 11 version while LG Q60 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's design is newer and extremely thinner, but also notably heavier than LG Q60.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a superior hardware performance than LG Q60, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a slightly better screen than LG Q60, because it has a much better resolution of 1768 x 2208, a larger display and a higher pixels amount in each inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 captures much better photographs and videos than LG Q60, because although it has a lot less mega-pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a much bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a way better video definition and a bigger diafragm aperture. The LG Q60 counts with more storage for apps and games than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has superior battery lifetime than LG Q60, because it has a 29% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.