Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-15 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.66 x 2.73 x 0.33 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6750 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a score of 80, which is much better than LG Q7's 72.2 overall score. Although the Google Pixel 3 and LG Q7 were released with only 4 months difference, the Google Pixel 3 body is a little bit heavier but also a little bit thinner than LG Q7. Google Pixel 3 has a bit more powerful processing unit than LG Q7, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 3 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 3 counts with just a bit better looking screen than LG Q7. They have a higher count of pixels per inch in the screen, a same size display and the same exact 1080 x 2160px resolution. LG Q7 features a bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 256 GB.
The Google Pixel 3 captures just a bit better photos and videos than LG Q7, because although it has a back camera with a worse 12.2 MP resolution, it also counts with a larger sensor capturing better quality photos and videos, a larger aperture for better low-light captures and a lot higher (4K) video quality.
The LG Q7 counts with just a bit better battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.