Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-15 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.66 x 2.73 x 0.33 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6750 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is better than LG Q7, getting an 81.9 score against 72.2. Even though Google Pixel 4 is heavier than the LG Q7, it's just a little bit thinner and also newer. Google Pixel 4 counts with a better hardware performance than LG Q7, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4 also has more RAM.
Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit sharper screen than LG Q7, because it has a quite better 1080 x 2280px resolution, a little bigger display and a bit better pixel density. LG Q7 has a greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 256 GB.
Google Pixel 4 captures a little bit better photographs and videos than LG Q7, because although it has a back facing camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a way larger camera aperture to capture better photos and videos in low-light environments, a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality photos and videos and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
LG Q7 has just a bit better battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 7% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.